Beyond the immediate use-case of CNNs for automation, there is an opportunity to leverage the internal representations learned by CNNs to perform large-scale data mining and support biological discovery. Complex, multi-faceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate to the new investigator award. This document is based on replies to a questionnaire sent to all teaching and research staff in the School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences. EPSRC is fully committed to develop and promote responsible innovation. meet the eligibility criteria of EPSRC New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme. You should also comment on any potential adverse consequences for humans, animals or the environment and whether these risks have been addressed satisfactorily in the application. There is no set way for answering questions on the form. You are asked to assess the application or report against a number of criteria. 954 . . Standard letters declaring general support for a project are often criticised by reviewers. The response must be a maximum of 2 pages. There are 2 parallel funding routes to this funding opportunity: The full economic cost of your project can be up to 200,000 with a duration of up to 2 years.
PDF EPSRC - Equality Impact Assessment Posted on 14 February 2018. You can also request support for research activity related costs, including consumables, for UK researchers during any time spent overseas. This should report your own confidence, or otherwise, in being able to make your assessment rather than your confidence in the success of the application if it were funded. These will be viewed against published applicant eligibility and project .
An NIA is not intended to be an alternative to a fellowship, standard mode grant or other similar funding mechanism.
Case for support - EPSRC - Research Councils UK However, prioritisation meetings generally find reviews most useful where they explicitly identify the main strengths and weaknesses in the application, while also giving a clear view on which should be accorded the greater significance and why. New Investigator Award ESRC Secondary Data Analysis Initiative Open Call SAGES Large Proposal Challenge Fund (LPCF) . EPSRC may reject applications that do not meet attachment format requirements. A full justification for your assessment of the application should be provided. New Investigator Awards are aimed at helping early career academics initiate their own independent research programme. Questions can be submitted prior to the event using the EPSRC international team email address or during the webinar using the question and answer function. For example, for animal research you should comment specifically on the need to use animals, the choice of species and the number of animals it is intended to use. Our trusted research and innovation principles set out UKRIs expectations of organisations funded by UKRI in relation to due diligence for international collaboration. 15 Customer reviews. This funding opportunity has 2 parallel funding routes: This page details the requirements for the open funding route of the funding opportunity. You should consider a broad range of impact measures, including qualitative indicators of research impact such as influence on policy and practice. If not, is there a clear and realistic plan to target potential beneficiaries of the outputs and outcomes? The clarity of presentation may help or hinder your ability to review an application, so a comment to this effect would be appropriate, but this should not become in any form a competition in stylish writing. HONORS AND AWARDS . Read the, the spread of applications across EPSRCs remit, the novelty, relationship to the context, timeliness and relevance to identified stakeholders, the ambition, adventure, transformative aspects or potential outcomes, the suitability of the proposed methodology and the appropriateness of the approach to achieving impact.
Frequently asked questions - UKRI - Research Councils UK Work in collaboration with . Researchers at UCL and University of Ghana have successfully predicted whether children have anaemia using only a set of smartphone images. This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Does the proposal specify routine and novel ways to engage end users or partners to help realise impacts? This application is scientifically or technically flawed, This application does not meet one or more of the assessment criteria, This application meets all assessment criteria but with clear weaknesses, This is a good application that meets all assessment criteria but with minor weaknesses, This is a strong application that broadly meets all assessment criteria. It is also assessed on applicant and partnerships (secondary), resources and management (secondary) and host organisation support (secondary). When applying: Select 'documents', then 'new document'. EPSRC therefore allows applicants to tailor the support that they request in order to facilitate this. For example: applicant is on maternity leave until a certain . EPSRC will not fund a project if it believes that there are ethical concerns that have been overlooked or not appropriately accounted for. the ideas, concepts and approaches proposed and any particularly strong or weak examples within the programme, whether the applicant has provided clear aims and objectives for the technical programme, and how they will monitor their achievements. The aim of this funding opportunity is to support early career researchers to initiate or . * SFI (Ireland) FNR . Acceptance to the New Investigator Award scheme is judged by EPSRC before the application is sent to expert peer review and is made on the basis of the content of the cover letter and the level of resources requested in the application. Three quotations for any equipment costing more than 25,000 should accompany the proposal. You can save completed details in Je-S at any time and return to continue your application later. Therefore, you should not use journal impact factor (or any hierarchy of journals), conference rankings and metrics such as the H-index or i10-index when assessing UKRI grants. As such, the focus should be on the stated impact rather than the duration. Opportunity status: Upcoming Funders: Funding type: Fellowship Publication date: 27 January 2023 Opening date: 10 February 2023 9:00am UK time Closing date: 5 April 2023 4:00pm UK time Last updated: 27 January . This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. You should also consider that this unequal impact may continue beyond the return to work. We expect the proposed collaborative project to present a balance between partnership building activities and direct research, as appropriate, considering the key objectives of the funding opportunity. In the context of this call early career researchers are defined as those who are currently eligible to apply to, or have been eligible to apply to in the past eight years, EPSRC New Investigator Awards, First Grants, Early Career Fellowships, Career Acceleration Fellowships, Challenging Engineering and Healthcare Technology Challenge Awards. The proposal, reviewers comments and your response will then go to a panel that will score it against our assessment criteria and rank it with other new investigator proposals. Customer Reviews.
PDF Fellowships in Energy and Engineering with the EPSRC and Royal Academy If you plan to use a major facility in your research, such as those funded centrally by EPSRC or a European facility, contact the facility before applying to EPSRC to check if your proposed research is feasible, and obtain a technical assessment if Je-S marks it as required. They should be read in conjunction with the reviewer principles. EPSRC . . We are always open for applications for new investigator awards. Argentina; Bolivia; Brazil; Canada; Chile; Colombia; Costa Rica; Dominican Republic acknowledges support from EPSRC New Investigator Award (grant ref. Certainty of outcome is not an indicator of excellence, but neither is an incremental approach necessarily an indicator that a proposal lacks excellence. These notes are intended to provide reviewers with specific guidance for the completion of the reviewer form. A Publication of the . Please leave enough time for your proposal to pass through your organisations Je-S submission route before this date. complements other UK research already funded in the area, including any relationship to the EPSRC portfolio. Where known impacts have occurred, these should have been highlighted in the application, including the assumptions and information at the point of submission. Pre-proposal writing steps - thinking about the proposal. Text in embedded diagrams or pictures, numerical formulae or references can be smaller, as long as it is legible. Reviewers are requested to comment on the effectiveness of the proposed planning and management making reference to equipment and resources as follows: You should draw attention to any request that in your view has not been justified or, conversely, if something is required but has not been identified. The case for support should describe the proposed research and its intended outcomes. All costs will be funded at 80% of full economic costs. New Investigator Award. | Learn more about Thomas Kecker's work experience, education, connections & more by visiting their profile on LinkedIn Sub-contracting costs can be claimed as an exception to bring in non-standard expertise and is relevant to research and help further the partnership but it needs to be distinguished from a co-investigator. Find out more about completing your application. Awards & honorary positions 1992 Schermerhorn Award - International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote EPSRC have this week re-launched their grant funding scheme targeted specifically at Early Career Researchers. The Functional Genomics Initiative Clusters funding opportunity has two stages. The new investigator award supports both theoretical and experimental research projects across EPSRCs remit. Find out more about eligibility for new investigator awards. The grant value may include the cost of access to facilities (these funds are not awarded to the grant holding organisation). The applicant is not expected to predict the impact of their research in terms of value, reach or significance, and therefore assessors should not: Drawing upon what the applicant has said, reviewers should comment on: The extent to which each bullet point is addressed will depend on the nature of the research proposed. Universities should pay particular attention to ensure that the new investigator is properly supported and mentored through their supervision of the student, and that adequate attention is paid to the training of both the student and the investigator. Those who are seeking to substantially exceed this should consider other funding opportunities. The changes also mean that some researchers who may have previously been ineligible to . Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter. We recognise that we have a duty of care to promote approaches to responsible innovation that will initiate ongoing reflection about the potential ethical and societal implications of the research that we sponsor and to encourage our research community to do likewise. For the New Investigator Award the proposal cover letter should describe how your experience and career history fit with the person eligibility guidance.
XLSX www.abdn.ac.uk A project partner letter of support, from each project partner listed, must be included as an attachment. HiDRA (Hierarchical Deep Representations of Anatomy) will address these challenges by developing a "multi-view-multi-task" approach that is . However applicants are not expected to work in isolation but will benefit from support from the university and the environment in which they will be working. For example, controlled sequences of cells in droplets with varied volumes is desirable in multi-volume droplet digital polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) for accurate detection of genetic information in cells.
Novel polymers of intrinsic microporosity for heterogeneous base Fast and efficient. Projects made up of multiple proposals have additional guidance. Found in: Talent UK - 30 minutes ago. Your project should typically last one to three years. Applicants are permitted to only be involved with 1 application for this funding opportunity. There is no simple definition of excellence. (15) The Development of Solvent-Free Reductions via . an early career researcher who meets the eligibility requirements of the EPSRC New Investigator Award scheme. The New Investigator Award scheme (which replaces the First Grant scheme) includes a number of changes from the previous scheme of which researchers who are considering applying should be aware.. Complex, multi-faceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate for this scheme. yBirgit van Huijgevoort and Soe Haesaert are with the Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands zOliver Schon and sadegh Soudjani are with Newcastle University, United Kingdom New Investigator Award: Starts: 05 January 2021: Ends: 04 August 2023: Value (): 243,689: . This is a very strong application that fully meets all assessment criteria. 3 members of the panel, introducers, will be asked to assess each of the projects. . Planning for activities that maximise the likelihood of any identified impacts occurring is a vital part of research. You can look for examples of funded projects by searching for new investigator in our online portfolio. letters of support from all project partners included in the Je-S form (no page limit), technical assessments for facilities listed as requiring one in the Je-S guidance (no page limit), host organisation letter of support (2 pages), cover letter (optional attachment, no page limit, not seen by peer review). comment explicitly on the viability of the arrangements described to access equipment needed for this project, and particularly on any university or third party contribution.