beyond vietnam rhetorical analysis beyond vietnam rhetorical analysis

Overall, the effective use of various rhetorical strategies is what makes the speech so valuable. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. And, to argue that King 's most radical days were never fulfilled; that his next campaign was to confront the president over the Vietnam War and economic disparity, a direct confrontation with a president over an immoral war state Hill and Wang from the book review. (These links will automatically appear in your email.). His speech emphasizes at transitioning from war to peace and from violence to a nonviolent and peaceful society. The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. us: [emailprotected]. The speech deemed racial segregation to be an inhumane practice that subdivides society into groups that essentially alienate them from the true sense of humanity; which is brotherhood. There were many reasons why so many Americans were against the war. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. As a leader of his people, King took the stand to take radical measures to overcome the false promises of the sovereign government that had been addressing the issues of racial segregation through unimplemented transparent laws that did nothing to change the grim realities of the society. When he argues that the wars immoral nature should be incandescently clear, he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, the integrity and life of America. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. Just like the people of America, the Vietnamese also have a right to live free on the lands of their fathers. requirements? His first reasons are all about practicality. But be assured that my tears have been tears of love (8). Using the approach, the context of the speech will be analyzed according to the classical cannon of rhetorical. He also says the war is further crippling the poor in the United States by sending a disproportional number of them to the front lines to die. Nothing could be lower than being placed parallel to the senseless violence of Nazi Germany. Many people believed that America had no reason to interfere, Dr. King being one of those people. Analyzes the literary device martin luther king jr. uses in his speech is allusions, adding to the importance on how awful the vietnam war was corrupting the united states. 1. Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism He talks about the innocent people killed in the crossfire, mostly children. The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.The nation as a whole began to uproar over the war and the major consequences of the war. Then the segregation of African Americans and White Americans started. It is why while he attacks America's intervention in Vietnam on the one hand, on the other he brings people's attention towards the other side of life where America can become a beacon of hope and peace for the entire world including Vietnam. America is overlooking its own poor and pouring resources into a war which does not offer any political, economic or social advantage. Over the past two years, as I have moved to break the betrayal of my own silences and to speak from the burnings of my own heart, as I have called for radical departures from the destruction of Vietnam, many persons have questioned me about the wisdom of my path. He was in the process of proving that it wasn 't a money issue in America, but an equality issue. He then outlines the history of the war in Vietnam, showing that he is not simply preaching about religious ideals. He wants them to go back to their churches and spread the message. They now also understand that the Vietnam War plays a bigger role in America than just the men gone to war, it affects others too, like them. It is clear that he wants the audience of church leaders to go back to their churches and fearlessly speak out in opposition of the war. The American intervention came at a time when the Vietnamese were expecting freedom and peaceful life and it came in a manner that was even devastating compared to the French occupation. May 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. On April 4, 1967, King addressed a crowd of 3,000 in Riverside Church by delivering a speech titled, "Beyond Vietnam," in the midst of the cruelty of the Vietnam War. describing the ways in which the war is detrimental to the American people, King writes that "Vietnam. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. For instance, he does when he depicts the, "Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools." Analysis Of Martin Luther King's Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence Martin Luther King Jr. in his speech, "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence, discusses the Vietnam war. All of the valid arguments and vivid imagery Dr. King uses combine to make this a very effective, passionate and memorable speech. Throughout the first paragraph of Kings speech, he used emotional diction with words such as struggle, poverty, and poor to prove that the war in Vietnam was bringing down the Americans and their families fighting overseas. King calms the African Americans who are being oppressed by using the words, this situation can and will be changed. and Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. which gives them hope that there will be a new day when a change will take place. He does this when he writes, "It was a step that rocked the richest, most powerful nation to its foundations" (King 96-97). His masterful delivery of these metaphors and the frequent repetition makes the speech much like a poem or a part of a song. The problems being faced by either America or Vietnam were never going to be solved through rifles but through peaceful and nonviolent action. Ironic elements are evident in abundance throughout Kings speech which elicit an comical tone and draws on the reality of the war. This essay was written by a fellow student. By continuing well assume you board with our, Rhetorical Analysis on Kennedy Steel Speech, Rhetorical Analysis of The Mexican-American and the Chruch Speech, Analysis of Dr. Martin Luther Kings I Have a Dream Speech, Rhetorical Devices in Bill Clintons Speech at the Democratic Convention, Speech Analysis: Speech in the Virginia Convention, How to secure financing as a small business owner, How to Make a Business Plan for Any Business, 7 Crucial Macro Environment Factors to Include in Your Analysis, Macro Environment Examples in the Real World. Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. It encompasses all humanity and not just America. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." King Jr delivered his "Beyond Vietnam -- A Time to Break Silence" in 1967 in NewYork City. In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence", delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967, he claims that the American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. Here, at ACaseStudy.com, we deliver professionally written papers, and the best grades for you from your professors are guaranteed! In a sense, he dives right into the idea that it is unrealistic for them to find freedom in a region halfway across the world when they couldnt even find it in America. Later, he mentions, I am a preacher by calling, I suppose it is not surprising that I have seven major reasons for bringing Vietnam into the field of my moral vision. (King). There is at the outset a very obvious and almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam and the struggle I, and others, have been waging in America. Then Dr. King says that the church should oppose the war simply because it is counter to the ministry of Jesus Christ. In Dr. Martin Luther King's speech "Beyond VietnamA Time to Break Silence" (1967), Dr. King asserts that the war in Vietnam is totally immoral and has far reaching negative implications not only for Vietnam, but for The United States and the rest of the World as well. Dr. King paints a vivid, heart-wrenching picture of the devastation in Vietnam. Apart from being an advocate of Mahatma Gandhi's idea of nonviolence, Martin Luther King Jr was a great leader and rhetor of all times. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. Public opinion steadily turned against the war following 1967 and by 1970 only a third of Americans believed that the U.S. had not made a mistake by sending troops to fight in Vietnam (Wikipedia). down the pipe, "I watched this program broken and eviscerated" through the "buildup in Vietnam,". Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. This paper examines the conditions of the Afro-Americans lives from 1960-today with focus on education, work, income, police brutality and criminality. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence By Martin Luther King "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. He changes his tone from passive to passionate. Not only were they fighting for their own rights in 1976, but they were sending away the son, husbands, brothers of other Americans thousands of miles away to the country of Vietnam to fight an unjust war for the rights of the people in Southeast Asia. These arguments work because they point out that even though the war is not happening on our soil, it is having a devastating effect here, especially in poor areas where people cannot afford to be hindered any more than they already are. His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. At last the paper discusses and assesses how to what an extent Kings dream came true with self-elected sources as backrest for the asses. Favorite Quote:Make as many as mistakes as you want, just don't make the same mistake. writing your own paper, but remember to These statements serve to communicate to the audience that the speaker is someone of authority and should be listened to. Dr. King says that the war is draining valuable resources that could be helping the poor in our own country. These emotionally charged images would seemingly convince anyone that the cause for this war could not possibly be just. King argues that all people are created equal and directly challenged the outdated and abhorrent views that upheld the false flag of racial superiority among White Americans. May 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. Supplemental understanding of the topic including revealing main issues described in the particular theme; To get his point through and make the meaning clear, King uses phrases like break the silence of the night, a vocation of agony, based upon the mandates of conscience, deeper level of awareness. Would you like to get a custom case study? "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" Rhetorical Analysis Introduction In this paper the speech "Beyond Vietnam" of Martin Luther king will be analyzed through the framework of Neo-Aristotelian criticism. Thank you for sharing this page with a friend! Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. The United States got involved in the Vietnam War because they wanted to stop the spread of communism. Registered address: Louki Akrita, 23 Bellapais Court, Flat/Office 46 1100, Nicosia, Cyprus He notes how essential it is to break silence before all hope is lost. For example, this quote personifies war as being an enemy. At the heart of their concerns, this query has often loomed large and loud: Why are you speaking about the war, Dr. King? Why are you joining the voices of dissent?(King). King said, the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at homeWe were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. Dr. King's purpose is . In this way, he appeals to the emotions of the audience and challenges the logic behind an unnecessary war. He uses metaphorical imagery, powerful diction,and symbolism to create an impact on the audience. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. Favorite Quote:"Faith is taking another step without seeing the entire staircase.". - M.J. As he notes towards the end of his speech, "If we will make the right choice, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our world into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood ". His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. In the speech, Martin Luther King specifically indicates that America needs to end the war with Vietnam. Moreover, it is the poor and the helpless mainly who are falling prey to this war game. The speech was given to a large, mixed audience of primarily civil rights activists. The irony is explicit in Kings words that the war is just an attempt to cover and hide the more pressing issues before America. He expresses his anguish at seeing people of Vietnam and America suffer and also notes that if American folks do not break their silence they stand to lose much more than their opponents. Favorite Quote:Life is like a box of cheese and flower petal sometimes it's soft and sweet, sometimes it just plain stinks. For instance, he starts by stating the effects of the Vietnam War forced the American poverty program: "experiments, hopes, new beginnings." Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence By Martin Luther King "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. (2022) 'The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis'. In the article "Beyond Vietnam", Martin Luther argues that war in Vietnam has far reaching affects that not only rapaciously take away America's resources, but make an immediate impact on African Americans perspective on the civil rights movement. Dont Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task. new way beyond the darkness that seems so close around us. King was really able to speak to his audience by using evidence, reasoning, and a persuasive writing style throughout his speech. 838 Words "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." [emailprotected] For example, he writes vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will, drown your sisters and brothers and hated filled policemen even kill your brothers and sisters (3). His pleas are first to the audiences sense of logic and their immediate concerns for their own country. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. King uses quotes as these to suggest to convince them of the destruction of the Vietnam War, with pathos, by strongly appealing to his audience's emotion. Rhetorical Mlk Speech "Beyond Vietnam". Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. May 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. Issues have been resolved because now the draft is less common because more people volunteer for war so the poor are not forced. This part of the speech is evoking violent images of death that would affect the emotions of the audience. If it is, let us trace its movements and pray that our own inner being may be sensitive to its guidance, for we are deeply in need of a new way beyond the darkness that seems so close around us. While his I Have a Dream speech is considered his best one, his other speeches too offer a glimpse of his powerful rhetoric and his art of persuasion. Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed. In front of over 3000 people at the New York Riverside Church King preaches to a room filled with clergy and laymen concerned about the Vietnam. This quote causes the audience to realize the contradiction in the Vietnam war policy, making them less likely to accept. Dr. King's purpose is to make the church leaders he is speaking to aware that Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. Copyright 2023 service.graduateway.com. Another rhetorical device is the common ground he establishes in his last sentence where he writes, "This is the story of Why We Can't Wait" (King 98-99). Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence In the speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence," by Martin Luther King Jr. he expresses his opinion on how the Vietnam war is unjust. Luther was a charismatic leader who took a firm stand against the oppressive and racist regime of the United States (US), devoting much of his life towards uniting the segregated African-American community of the US. As a civil right mover he gave this great speech to all Americans (black and white) so that he could give off the idea of equality on the same level. King successfully brings out the irony behind the war through the use of figurative speech and plenty of imagery to paint a picture of destruction and doom in Vietnam. However, he wishes that they would have lived up to his respect, and continues to hope that they will do so in the future. Rhetorical devices are included in Martin Luther Kings speeches to prove conflict. Rhetorical Analysis Of Mlk's Beyond Vietnam. Favorite Quote:Failures help one grow as a person. This is an obvious and extremely effective argument, especially among a group of Christian church leaders. match. Acasestudy.com 2007-2019 All rights reserved. Dr. King says, Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men do not easily assume the task of opposing their governments policy, especially in time of war (3). It also uses a bit of strong imagery. Kings main motive was to persuade people to see how war was destroying lives, society and economy and being silent meant being in approval of the war. Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. Dr. King includes a brief, but poignant history of the war in Vietnam which is important because he needs to prove that he knows and understands the politics of the situation. The rhetoric helps prove how the poor lived worse in the, King, a supporter of President Lyndon B. Johnson and his Great Society, became concerned about U.S. involvement in Vietnam. His choice of words in the speech is meant to have a direct effect on the audience's psychology. His use of imagery and diction is aimed at making people break their silence and express their anger clearly. However, his words while they aim to bring the pain of the Vietnamese alive before the audience also include a request that a progressive nation should stand with humanity and not lose control of its feelings. For instance, he does when he depicts the, Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools. The image of death, as powerful as it is, becomes amplified when Martin Luther King associates the injustices of segregation with the Vietnam war. Martin Luther King Jr proves to all throughout his speech Beyond Vietnam --- A Time to Break Silence that the Vietnam war was unjust by his use of emotional diction, the allusion of Jim crow, and repetition. Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. He spoke at Riverside Church in New York City, a venue that had a history of hosting progressive speakers and thinkers. Luthers speech was a passionate rhetoric that preached his views about the future. The author is using pathos as one of his central rhetorical strategies. This use of repetitive language conveys urgency and shows that he deeply believes the churches may influence the government if they speak against the war. By continuing well This convinces the reader to fully consider how the war has brought detrimental consequences, and through Kings diction, he is capable of convincing his audience to, When speaking about how the war had initially seem to have brought opportunities, he says, Then came the buildup in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated, as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war, and I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor. Evidently, the program for the poor was meant to be used in helping the poor, but as soon as the funds were directed to the Vietnam War, resources were no longer cast in their direction.