What to do about it? manuscript under consideration 26th july 21 manuscript submitted 3rd june 21 The review results were returned at the end of July. Today we take one more step by offering an integrated preprint deposition service to our authors as part of the submission process. Authors are encouraged to consider the needs of colourblind readers (a substantial minority of the male population) when choosing colours for figures. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? For first submissions (i.e. I am confused since the current status was already passed before the editors sent the manuscript out for review. Did any DOS compatibility layers exist for any UNIX-like systems before DOS started to become outmoded? How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? [CDATA[> Nature Communications (Nat Commun) Thanks so much It was the first time to submit nature materials, but was rejected by the editor, and it is recommended to transfer to nature comm. For specific details, see Formatting an Initial Submission. The average number of days from manuscript acceptance to the first appearance of the article online. Alternatively, authors may choose to request a fresh review, in which case they should not use the automated transfer link, and the editors will evaluate the paper without reference to the previous review process. The journal editors will take the previous reviews into account when making their decision, although in some cases the editors may choose to take advice from additional referees. Please note that it is not possible to add/modify ORCID details at proof. Supplementary Information is not copy-edited byNature Communicationsafter acceptance, so authors should ensure that it is clearly and succinctly presented, and that the style and terminology conform with the rest of the paper. If material is not included in the articles Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The dot pattern on a laser print often creates a moir pattern when scanned. Thank you for visiting nature.com. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16788-3, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16788-3. A description of the statistical treatment of error analysis should be included in the figure legend. Grant details and acknowledgments are not permitted as numbered references. For first submissions (i.e. But the confusing part is, is that the reviewer are now done with reviewing (Review completed) but the new status became apperently ''Manuscript under consideration". In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Nature cell Biology editor NatureManuscript under consideration Manuscript Under Editorial Consideration for 9 days nature Nature Immunology EMBO J nature EMBO J Manuscript under consideration 16th September 21 2021.09.17 321active sites density30Response Letter https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16788-3. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles is still under consideration Detailed Question - 23 days ago, I transferred my manuscript from Nature Physics to Nature Communications and an editor was assigned soon. From the MTS homepage, click Modify my Springer Nature account and then ORCID Create/link an Open Researcher Contributor ID (ORCID) in the Personal Profile tab. Internet Explorer). Information about the common editorial policies of Nature journals, including Nature Communications, is available here. Nature Communications Only papers that have been published or accepted by a named publication or recognized preprint server should be in the numbered list. Failure to do so, or to adhere to the following guidelines, can significantly delay publication of your work. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. We have tracked this myth under the Gellert form from India to Wales; but under another form it is the property of the whole Aryan family, and forms a portion of the traditional lore of all nations sprung from that stock. The editorial process is iterative and highly subjective. If you want to participate in double-blind peer review, prepare your manuscript in a way that conceals the identities of all the authors and tick the appropriate box during online submission. Across all Wolters Kluwer journals, the average time that a manuscript moves through the submission process from submission to first decision takes about 30 days, and to a final decision about 54 days, but this is dependent upon many factors and is different for each journal. My understanding is that "Editorial Decision Started" means an Editor has been assigned and is reviewing the manuscript. Unless it is just rejected by an editor. This statement will be published at the end of all papers, whether or not a competing interest is reported. Reasonable requests to enlarge figures will be considered, but editors will make the final decision on figure size. Authors of submitted manuscripts which include the image Lena will be requested to substitute the image, or justify the scientific necessity for using the image, prior to peer review. Nature Communications | Peer-Review Duration, Review Speed, Revision This is known as a rescinding. We do, however, support the posting of preprints. Standard abbreviations for reagents and solvents are encouraged. Nature Communications uses a transparent peer review system, where for manuscripts submitted from January 2016 we are publishing the reviewer comments to the authors and author rebuttal letters. Nature | Peer-Review Duration, Review Speed, Revision Process The status of the manuscript says 'Reviewers Assigned' for about 24 days. Do new devs get fired if they can't solve a certain bug? Manuscript Nature switched from ''Review completed'' to ''manuscript under consideration'' Dear, As a co-author, i saw recently that our paper switched from status. How many weeks of holidays does a Ph.D. student in Germany have the right to take? //-->How to submit | Nature Communications Jun Long LIM, PhD - STAR Ambassador - A*STAR - LinkedIn How can we prove that the supernatural or paranormal doesn't exist? This section should be subdivided by short headings referring to methods used and we encourage the inclusion of specific sections for statistics, reagents and animal models. All textual material should be provided as a single file in default Computer Modern fonts. Please read thedigital images integrity and standardspolicy. Use one name throughout and include the other at first mention: 'Oct4(also known asPou5f1)'. A manuscript under editorial consideration indicates that the work has not been rejected out of hand, but is being given a second look. In legends, please use visual cues rather than verbal explanations such as "open red triangles". Authors who nevertheless wish to post a list of Supplementary References should ensure that the Supplementary Information is self-contained (it should not refer to the list of References in the main paper; any such papers should be duplicated in the list of Supplementary References) and that Supplementary References are numbered sequentially from 1. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. In addition, many are not native English speakers. Thus, technical jargon should be avoided as far as possible and clearly explained where its use is unavoidable. Internet Explorer). Nat Commun 11, 2959 (2020). Based on the Nature Review Speed Feedback System, it takes publisher 14.0 days to publish the accepted manuscript online. In my experience they are at the end of the week, because we usually get editorial decision friday or monday. What does "Editor Decision Started" mean? : r/labrats - reddit As part of the service offered by In Review, authors will be able to track the status of their manuscript thanks to a private peer review timeline, showing main events such as the recruitment of a reviewer or the receipt of a reviewer report. A Supplementary Note should be used only in consultation with the editors and for specific elements best presented in Supplementary Information, such as stand-alone descriptions related to methods (for example, algorithm description or compound synthesis and characterization). We discourage deposition of references within the Supplementary Information as they will not be live links and will not contribute towards citation measures for the papers concerned. While the word preprint might sound archaic in a digitally-led world, the need for early sharing and discovery of results has never been greater, particularly at a time when a pandemic is sweeping the globe. [CDATA[> Nature Communications those who have had the fortune to be admitted to holy . Or reviewers are not responding to the editor after the request to review the revised manuscript by the editor? [CDATA[> manuscript under editorial consideration nature methods; manuscript under editorial consideration nature methods. Nature Communicationsis read by scientists from diverse backgrounds. File sizes should be as small as possible, with a maximum size of 30 MB, so that they can be downloaded quickly. The "manuscript under consideration" is the process of the editor making their case about whether they think the manuscript is worth sending to peer-review. Authors are asked to provide specific information about their submission. Answer: In the case of a desk rejection, authors are notified within the first few days. To assist with the peer review process, figures and tables may be included within the manuscript text. This will re-direct you to the ORCID website. I heard that a first editorial decision is likely to be made within a few days after submission. . Based on Nature's website it looks like the editor sends a letter regardless of the decision so your editor is probably just writing the decision and it could be anything from accept without revision (hopefully) all the way to reject without reconsideration. Please submit electronic files at acceptance and include a clear and concise legend explaining the image. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. We will monitor reception of this new service by our authors, and continue to evolve our offering to them in response to the needs of the community. This page includes information on manuscripts reviewed at other Nature journals, competing interests declarations, pre-publication publicity, deposition of data as a condition of publication, availability of data and reagents after publication, human and animal subjects, digital image integrity, biosecurity, refutations, complaints, correction of mistakes, duplicate publication, confidentiality and plagiarism. March 1, 2023 by . We strongly believe in the importance of this practice to increase transparency in the research process and to speed up the dissemination and re-use of scientific results, while maintaining that a rigorous peer-review (normally coordinated as part of the publication process in a journal) is needed to validate the findings. I wonder if this is a usual case. Early sharing of results in preprints has been a familiar practice for some research communities for decadesphysicists will know that the arXiv is turning 30 next year and has grown in popularity with many other communities in the past 510 years, perhaps catalysed by the launch of bioRxiv, which now serves a large community of researchers in the life sciences. Please consult the appropriate nomenclature databases for correct gene names and symbols. //-->Manuscript under consideration nature - dupek.talkwireless.info Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? In cases where manuscripts are declined from Nature Communications, authors may wish to use the same manuscript transfer service to submit their paper to a journal in the Communications series,Scientific Reports or other in-house journals. Acknowledgements should be briefand should not include effusive comments. Although a basic knowledge of science may be assumed, please bear in mind that the language and concepts that are standard in one field may be unfamiliar to non-specialists. This is more confusing as generally, 'Manuscript Under consideration' means that the editor is considering the manuscript for peer review. After being under the status 'All reviewers assigned', the manuscript status changed back to 'Manuscript Under consideration'. Featured Popular 658 Enrolled Preview Handbook Save for later 30 mins English text Online, On-demand learning Access on any device 8 modules [CDATA[> From today, our authors have the option to take advantage of In Review, a free preprint deposition service integrated with the submission process to our journal. It can mean many things, if the status has been same since you resubmitted your manuscript then editor might still be waiting for all the reviewers to send the editors their review reports, in some cases when one reviewer is too much busy and needs more time to finalize his review report, editors waits for him to send his comments then they contact the author and make a decision on the basis of these reports and send you acceptance, rejection or revision based on their reports. Can I tell police to wait and call a lawyer when served with a search warrant? All Rights Reserved. Nature Communications is an open access, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the biological, physical, chemical and Earth sciences. Approved mouse symbols are provided by The Jackson Laboratory, e-mail:[email protected]; see alsowww.informatics.jax.org/mgihome/nomen. For optimal results, prepare figures to fit the pdf page size (210 x 276 mm), and supply the figure in the format in which they were compiled. Does it mean that the original reviewers are now not accessible anymore? Before a manuscript is submitted, please review our journal policies, and ensure that the submission complies with our policy requirements. and JavaScript. Blot and gel images should be pasted in and labelled with the relevant panel and identifying information such as the antibody used. Commun. In practice this means that the absolute width of single-column figures should be no less than 1,040 pixels wide and double-column figures should be no less than 2,080 pixels wide (excluding peripheral white space). Once the manuscript is published, the preprint will link to the published version. library.lincoln.ac.uk All display items should be on a white background, and should avoid excessive boxing, unnecessary colour, spurious decorative effects (such as three-dimensional 'skyscraper' histograms) and highly pixelated computer drawings. I have a revised manuscript which I submitted to Nature Communications. Follow this link for information about the different types of contributions, along with their length and figure limits. (in principle) (accept) (online)NC (Open Access Licence) (Article-processing charge)NC (Proof)Online6 (19:00 Japanese time), *** (20209-20212)140, 2020921Nature Structural & Molecular BiologyManuscript Transferred, 1016109110162, 1020, 1112 (point-by-point response to reviewers' comments), 1211NC (editorial requests), 113NC (proof), *** (20215-20222)250, 2021527Nature Chemical BiologyManuscript Transferred, 76 (Reviewer65), 1031 (point-by-point response to reviewers' comments), 11223 (653), 1213NC (editorial requests), 2022216~ (Editors' Highlights), Nature Communications, (Naturetransfer)NCzipZip of files for Reviewer2-4, Nature Communications, (Peer Review File)NCTransparent peer reviewPeer Review File, reviewer. The manuscript was under review when it was showing 'all reviewers assigned' and when the status changed to 'under consideration' it means that reviews are back with her and she is discussing it with her collegues. So, in October 2018, we added a new . What does the status "under consideration" mean? - Editage Insights For graphics, we recommend graphicx.sty. The vertical axis of histograms should not be truncated to exaggerate small differences. ]]> Trying to understand how to get this basic Fourier Series. The Methods section should be written as concisely as possible but should contain all elements necessary to allow interpretation and replication of the results. When the preprint is posted, a HTML version of the manuscript will be created and displayed when original figures are available, making it more machine-readableand hence easier to be discovered by search enginesthan a PDF. A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). Languages English Espaol Portugus Research Creative My Account Submit My Manuscript Evolving our support for early sharing. The abstract should not contain any undefined abbreviations or unspecified references. This is more confusing as generally, 'Manuscript Under consideration' means that the editor is considering the manuscript for peer review. Instead, we prefer to make decisions with all relevant material at hand, and therefore encourage you to submit your full manuscript to us. Nature Communications - SCI - - Why do universities check for plagiarism in student assignments with online content? Recovering from a blunder I made while emailing a professor. Designate each item as Supplementary Table, Figure, Movie, Audio, Note, Data, Discussion, Equation or Methods, as appropriate.